0.6 C
New York
Home Blog Page 1313

MMT probes Greenlink route

0

MMT vessel MV Franklin has started survey work on the 170km route of the 500MW Greenlink interconnector between Ireland and Wales.

The work will take about 40 days, depending on the weather, and will also involve MV Seabeam, MV Edda Fonn and Red7 jack-up Seariser 2.

Surveys include intertidal topographic, geophysical/hydrographic and geotechnical investigations, as well as cone penetration testing and environmental sampling.

They will take place between Freshwater West in Pembroke, Wales, and Baginbun in County Wexford, Ireland.

The data will be used to confirm the preferred route for the link and will also contribute to the cable burial risk assessment and planning applications.

Greenlink project director Simon Ludlam said: "We are delighted to have appointed the expertise of MMT to undertake the marine survey work for Greenlink."

This will collect vital data for the project development and planning applications, helping us determine the best route between Pembrokeshire and County Wexford from an environmental, health and safety and economic point of view.

The launch of the surveying work today is a significant step in the development of this important electricity infrastructure project.”

Source:Renews

Bombora eyes kit to rule Welsh waves

0

Welsh wave developer Bombora Europe has launched a tender for the design and supply of a control system for its 1.5MW mWave device.

The control system is expected to include SCADA for submerged equipment installed on the seabed and an onshore operating station.

Potential bidders to design, test, supply and install both software and hardware have until 10 October to register their interest via the Sell2Wales website.

The deadline for tender bids is 7 December and a contract award is due by 7 January.

The Pembroke Dock company was awarded £10.3m of EU funds earlier this month to support its £15m project to install a 1.5MW full-scale device in Milford Haven in 2020.

Source:renwes

Royal IHC to Build Four New Vessels for DEME

0

The Netherlands based Royal IHC said it has secured a contract from Belgium-based DEME for the design and build of four new vessels.

The order consists of a copy of the liquefied natural gas(LNG) powered 8,400m3 trailing suction hopper dredger (TSHD) Scheldt River delivered in 2017, as well as a 2,300m3 TSHD and two 3,500m3 split barges.

The compact design of the 2,300m3 TSHD is characterized by a small draught and can be deployed for projects in shallow water worldwide, the builder said.

The two split barges are based on the IHC standard split trail 3,500 design. According to Royal IHC, the ease and speed of disposal makes them attractive for use in combination with backhoe dredgers, grab hopper dredgers and CSDs such as the Spartacus, which is currently being built by IHC in Krimpen aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.

Dave Vander Heyde, CEO of Royal IHC, said, “IHC is proud that DEME has ordered four highly competitive new vessels. With this order, the number of trailing suction hopper dredgers in the fleet of DEME, designed and built by IHC, adds up to 21.”

This order once again signifies our ongoing commitment to operate the most modern, versatile and environmental friendly fleet in the industry,” said Alain Bernard, CEO and Director of DEME. “With our multi-year fleet investment program, we are driving new levels of performance, further enhancing the capacity of our fleet, and providing our clients with flexible solutions for dredging and reclamation projects in various environments.

Source:marinelink

Chinese state-owned TV channel highlights role of Piraeus Port in Maritime Silk Road

0

The Eastern Mediterranean’s largest port, Piraeus, was the star of the recent China Global Television Network (CGTN) report ‘Where the maritime silk road meets land’.

We consider the Piraeus terminals a pioneer of Chinese investments in Greece,” said Tassos Vamvakidis, commercial manager at Piraeus Container Terminal S.A. which is controlled under a 35-year concession agreement by Cosco Shipping. Cosco also holds a majority stake in the Athens Stock Exchange-listed Piraeus Port Authority

Since taking over the concession to operate the port container terminals II and III in at the tail end of 2010, the Cosco subsidiary has turned Piraeus from a port handling less than 1m teu annually into one now handling over 4m teu and a major terminal for vessels traveling from Asia to Europe.

Many of the containers discharged in Piraeus are in transit and subsequently delivered to central and eastern European by ship and by rail. Some 10 express trains depart from Piraeus every week for destinations throughout central and eastern Europe, passing through Hungary, Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

Piraeus is a strategic location for us to provide rapid transportation services. We have provided high efficiency services for our customers,” said Su Xudong, md at Cosco Shipping Lines Greece.

To boost efficiency, the firm established a new subsidiary last year just to handle the railway business. The subsidiary commits to localisation. Among its 140 employees, only four are Chinese, thus providing work for local people.

Addressing concerns Chinese investment may take over the market in the area, the company’s manager says she doesn’t think so. “There is growth of business, and this is applied to all of Europe, not just Greece. In my opinion, what the Chinese government is attempting is a healthy investment.”

Su said: “The entire service chain, including our equipment and staff, we all rely on local resources. We never thought of dominating the market. We vow to have an open market based on the idea of mutual benefit.

Cosco is “investing and building infrastructure, which benefits my country”, Varvara Skavatsou, manager of the control-rail tower department at Cosco Shipping Lines Greece, said.

Su told CGTN the demand at the Piraeus itself is small. But thanks to the connectivity, the trade volume has increased. And as for Chinese exporters, they benefit from convenient services.

Source:seatrade-maritime

Stemming the decline of the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway System

0

In early September, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), released a report, which had been written in response to a request from legislator, to review efforts underway on modernising the Great Lakes- Seaway System, which has seen declines in traffic over the past decades.

GAO is a consultancy within the US Congress, performing economic analyses and then reporting back to legislators who must authorize spending and then allocate money.

The report was initially requested by Congressman Bill Shuster, a Republican from Pennsylvania, who has chaired the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, along with Senator Jim Inhofe, Republican from Oklahoma, who serves on the US Senate’s Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

The report notes: “The tons of cargo moved by domestic Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway traffic have declined since 1980—by 32 and 48%, respectively, according to US Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) and Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (US Seaway Corporation) data.”

Causes noted were a shift in the US heartland away from manufacturing- which was the traditional driver of demand for movements of iron ore and coal in bulk. Deteriorating infrastructure is also a big concern. A major chokepoint on the Lakes, the Soo Locks (in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan- linking Lake Superior with points to the east) has been identified, in a 2015 report, by the Department of Homeland Security, as vital to national security.

The Lakes and Seaway offer management challenges, in that the waterways are maintained by governmental entities, yet it is commercial businesses, subject to economic trends, that actually determine the cargo flows. One description of issues facing the US Seaway Corporation illustrates this challenge vividly, with the report writers saying: “Without a formal assessment of risks, the US Seaway Corporation lacks information on the cumulative effect of the challenges faced by users of the system, limiting its ability to inform its future actions to help address those challenges.”   With such issues in mind, the GAO recommendations center on creating, “a process to identify, analyze, and monitor risks to the system's use to inform future actions”.

Constraints facing users of the locks were also paramount, with a recommendation that, “the Army Corps develop and adopt goals and measures to assess the performance of the Soo Locks and assess of asset renewal outcomes.”

There is still a long way to go in maintaining locks in the region. A study done in 2007 identified dozens of needed infrastructure renewal projects. Data in the just released GAO report shows that the Army Corp has finished 18 projects, worth approximately $53m to date, and has about $257m in remaining and ongoing work through 2035. The US Seaway Corporation has completed 16 projects totaling $45m with roughly $144m in work still to be done through 2023.

The GAO analysts who prepared the report talked to numerous industry participants and were able to identify some positive trends possibly emerging. Interviews with “stakeholders” suggested possible brightspots in project cargoes (including wind turbine blades), containers, and the cruise business.

The report went on to identify issues facing these “emerging” trades; the winter closure, typically for three- four months during December – March, impedes regular movements of the containers and project cargoes. There is a bit of “chicken and egg” here; the GAO identified lack of infrastructure in ports to handle new cargo types- the ports suggested that their ability to raise finance was impeded because of inconsistency of cargo moves.

There are many challenges facing owners, cargo shippers and ports around the Great Lakes; hopefully the suggestions in the GAO report will push “stakeholders” towards viable solutions.

Source:seatrade-maritime

MSC to introduce new fuel surcharge to pass on cost of low sulphur compliance

0

Mediterranean Shipping Co (MSC) has followed its alliance partner Maersk Line in announcing a new fuel surcharge from 1 January 2019 to take into account the additional cost of the IMO’s 0.5% global sulphur cap from the start of 2020.

MSC said that the measures the line would implement to meet the 0.5% sulphur regulation would cost it in excess of $2bn a year. To meet increased operating costs MSC will be introducing a new Global Fuel Surcharge from the start of next year which it said would help customers plan for the impact the fuel regime post-2020.

The new MSC Global Fuel Surcharge will replace existing bunker surcharge mechanisms and will reflect a combination of fuel prices at bunkering ports around the world and specific line costs such as transit times, fuel efficiency and other trade-related factors,” the company said.

The 0.5% sulphur cap has been estimated to cost the container shipping industry $15bn annually from 2020, and CMA CGM estimates it will equate to an additional $160 per teu on average based on current conditions.

Last week Maersk, MSC’s partner in the 2M alliance, announced it would be introducing a new bunker adjustment factor from 1 January 2019 to pass on the additional costs of complying with the sulphur cap.

The announcement drew the ire of shipper and freight forwarder representative bodies, but as well as MSC most other major lines look set to follow with their own surcharge structures. CMA CGM, APL, Orient Overseas Container Line (OOCL) and Ocean Network Express (ONE) have all said the additional costs will have to be passed onto customers.

Source:Seatrade-maritime

An LNG cargo’s journey is just beginning when it reaches port

0

Considering the expected growth in US LNG exports over the next several years, it is natural to focus on the developers, construction contractors, regulators and contract pricing mechanisms that enable the resources to flow.

But, what happens at the next step in the LNG value chain when cargoes get where they are going?

At Enagas’ regasification terminal at the Port of Barcelona, which received a shipment from Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass export terminal in Louisiana in August aboard the GasLog Salem tanker, the LNG is distributed to customers in Spain and throughout Europe via a variety of means.

The most common is for the LNG to be converted back into pipeline-ready gas and then delivered to the local grid that serves Barcelona and grids that serve the rest of Spain.

During a tour Thursday following the conclusion of the weeklong Gastech conference, the terminal operation manager, Ramses Ninou, explained how the LNG, at a temperature of -160 degrees Celsius, is fed through compressors and filtered into big vats of seawater that are warmed to 40-50 C. Thirteen kilos of seawater is needed for each kilo of LNG.

The process returns the liquid gas to its dry gas state, and the water is returned to the sea only about 5-6 degrees warmer than when it was extracted, officials say.

At this time of year, the facility’s sendout rate to the grids is about 600,000 cubic meters of gas per hour. The gas is used to fuel power plants, heat homes, produce electricity and serve industrial facilities. The Barcelona terminal’s maximum sendout rate is 2 million cu m of gas per hour, but the highest rate it has reached was 1,650,000 cu m per hour during one recent high-demand winter.

The terminal also distributes small loads of LNG by truck to customers in Spain and several other countries. An average of 25 trucks are loaded each day, bound for countries including Italy, France and the UK.

The trucks that go to Italy can be lifted onto vessels for the journey across the Mediterranean Sea. The trucks can even reach Macedonia a few thousand kilometers away, as the insulated hull is able to secure the LNG for up to 50 days without any material boil-off.

If LNG is delivered by truck, it would be regasified at its ultimate destination.

For customers that don’t need the LNG or converted dry gas right away, the terminal can park the LNG in its six storage tanks for later use.

Enagas receives six-seven LNG tankers a month with an average capacity of 150,000 cubic meters. It also can handle the supersized Q-Flex tankers. The biggest exporters to the facility include Australia, Qatar, Nigeria, the US and Norway, officials say.

Because some of the exporters liquefy heavier types of LNG than others, the facility’s storage tanks are loaded from the top and bottom, and the density inside the tanks is constantly monitored.

So, how about those medium-size loads of gas that an industrial customer outside of Spain might need — ones that are perhaps not as feasible for a pipeline, too big for a truck and too small for a vessel?

Germany’s VTG AG, a wagon hire and rail car company, has designed what it describes as a “movable pipeline,” a large rail car capable of delivering mid-size loads of LNG from Enagas’ import terminal in Barcelona to the rest of Europe.

The rub? Big money is needed to extend the rail tracks from where a prototype now sits adjacent to the Enagas facility. Other infrastructure also is needed to make the LNG-by-rail proposal a reality, says Heinz-Jurgen Hiller, an international manager for the company.

Hiller says his company is talking to some interested parties who may be willing to finance some of the needed infrastructure. His pitch: VTG would lease the LNG rail cars, with a cost to the shipper that is meaningfully cheaper than taking the same-size load on several trucks.

LNG-by-rail isn’t the only thing Enagas is experimenting with along with its vendors at the Barcelona terminal.

It is trying to sell some of the freezing cold air that comes off the LNG as it is filtered through its facility. A rectangular walk-in freezer sits at the site — the effect inside was created with LNG that was received at the terminal.

Officials say industrial clients who operate refrigerated warehouses might be interested in such a product.

The growing number of regasification facilities popping up all over Europe and planned for the years ahead are part of the reason US exporters are so bullish about future demand for their liquefaction.

Source:hellenicshippingnews

Germany’s Commercial Shipping Fleet Shrinks by a Third

0

Germany, one of the world’s main maritime players, saw its commercial fleet shrink by a third over the past six years, becoming the biggest loser in a vicious industry slump that has reshaped global shipping.

Once the world’s predominant shipping lenders, most German banks have abandoned ship finance as they’ve written off tens of billions of nonperforming loans to cope with around $100 billion in toxic debt and sold scores of vessels to foreign owners at knockoff prices.

The contraction in German shipping stems from an unprecedented downturn over the past decade in which a glut of ships in the water, exacerbated by easy lending practices, pushed freight rates well below break-even levels.

Germany’s crumbled ship-finance structure is the most visible result of overleveraging in the business in the period leading up to the global financial crisis in 2008. Demand for ocean trade fell in the world-wide downturn, leaving some of the country’s biggest banks holding repossessed vessels because owners couldn’t pay back loans.

The grim picture also dealt a serious blow to investors, which included hundreds of thousands of German citizens—from dentists and engineers to small-business owners—that put their money into shipping with encouragement from local governments.

Lack of ship financing and the inability to cover interest and principal payments have resulted in the massive sales of German vessels,” said Alfred Hartmann, president of the German Shipowners Association, known as the VDR.

Stricter regulation of European banks since the financial crisis has required that banks hold more equity capital than in the past. Large ship operators can still raise capital in places like China, London, New York and Oslo, “but smaller companies have a much harder time finding new investors,” Mr. Hartmann said.

VDR data show that German owners operate 2,400 vessels compared with 3,800 in 2012. In terms of gross tonnage the number is down by a quarter. The majority of ships went to cash-rich Greek owners, followed by Chinese and Singaporean operators.

At its worst, there have been cases of five-year old ships that were sold as low as twice scrap price, or a 70% discount,” said Basil Karatzas, chief executive of New York-based Karatzas Marine Advisors, who has been involved in the sale of many German ships through an insolvency administrator.

For decades, German shipping money has been tied to so-called Kommanditgesellschaft funds, or KGs. Banks and asset managers hawked shares in the closed-end funds to private investors, and in the late 2000s, some 440,000 people became part owners of ships, according to German shipping law firm Kravets & Kravets.

They were lured in by favorable terms like full participation in the ship’s profits, with liability limited to the value of their shares. They also only paid a minimum flat tax to the federal government under a system designed to keep local companies competitive with owners in Asia.

Major banks like Commerzbank , CRZBY 0.58% HSH Nordbank and NordLB were deeply involved in KGs.

Before the 2008 crisis, some 26% of new ship orders book came from Germany. Today that number has fallen to less than 2.3%, and hundreds of KGs have gone insolvent.

KGs need long-term charters that attract bank financing. But with market uncertainty and growing risks from trade wars, such contracts have become rare.

When the market turned sour, the retail investors got burned and have zero interest in investing in shipping again,” Mr. Karatzas said. “The banks stopped lending money to the KGs and the whole edifice crumbled.

The shipping crisis brought some banks to the verge of collapse.

HSH Nordbank became the world’s biggest ship financier in the 2000s when its balance sheet grew to more than €200 billion ($235 billion) as it aggressively expanded its shipping portfolio.

But after suffering massive losses and facing the threat of liquidation by European regulators, the bank was sold this year for €1 billion to a group of U.S. private-equity firms.

This bank had to write off about 10 billion euros in shipping, and this will certainly never happen again,” said Stefan Ermissch, HSH’s chief executive.

The lender has cut its shipping exposure to €5 billion from a 2008 peak of $40 billion and now does shipping transactions only with a small number of German customers and select clients from Greece, Asia and the U.S.

Deutsche Bank , DB +0.00% Germany’s flagship lender, agreed In June to sell $1 billion worth of nonperforming shipping loans to U.S. investors Oak Hill Advisors and Varde. Deutsche’s shipping loans stood at €3.3 billion at the end of March, down from at €3.7 billion in 2017.

State controlled NordLB plans to be partially privatized and is marketing €2 billion in nonperforming loans, mostly from shipping, at a discount.

Others have abandoned shipping altogether. Commerzbank has slashed its ship portfolio of more than €20 billion in 2012 to €1.4 billion and has stopped giving out new loans.

We expect the rundown of our ship financing portfolio will be finalized well before the original 2020 target,” a bank spokesman said.

Source:hellenicshippingnews

IMO 2020 to cause one-off oil demand surge before market adjusts: OPEC

0

Tighter global shipping pollution regulations from 2020 will lead to a temporary surge in oil demand while denting the oil revenues of producers of heavy or high sulfur crudes, OPEC said in its annual long-term oil forecast

Sunday.

The International Maritime Organization’s global marine fuels sulfur cap of 0.5% in 2020 will produce a one-off jump in crude demand from the global refining system in order to meet for the need for compliant, non-marine residual fuels, OPEC said.

In order to produce sufficient volumes of middle distillates, the global refining system is expected to increase runs by around 400,000 b/d in 2020 (additional to the case if no IMO regulations were adopted),” OPEC said in its latest World Oil Outlook.

As a result, global oil demand growth is expected to bounce back to 1.7 million b/d in 2020, from 1.4 million b/d in 2019, OPEC said.

But it acknowledged that “as global supply and demand adapt to the regulations, and energy efficiency trends grow, annual demand increases post-2020 are expected to revert to a lower level, some 900,000 b/d in 2021 and 800,000 b/d in 2022 and 2023.” Crude price impact

OPEC also signaled that the IMO’s regulations will negatively impact the bulk of OPEC members who mainly produce heavy or high sulfur crudes.

Prices for heavy and sour crudes are expected to weaken “potentially severely” from 2020, while light crudes are expected to benefit and command a premium over heavy grades, the report stated.

The report estimates that more than 200,000 b/d of the incremental refining demand in 2020 will be surplus high-sulfur fuel oil that will “create pressure on its price and possibly lead to a heavy discount.”

The IMO announced the new global sulfur cap — down from the current limit of 3.5% — in October 2016, but several shipping and bunker industry representatives have questioned whether the organization will be able to enforce the regulation.

OPEC said it expects compliance to increase gradually in the years after 2020 as more ships install scrubbers — equipment that sprays alkaline water into a vessel’s exhaust to remove sulfur and other unwanted chemicals, allowing it to continue burning high sulfur fuel oil while complying with the new regulation.

The report forecast that about 2,000 vessels will have scrubbers installed by 2020, compared with about 500 vessels this year, once the financial incentive in the form of a widening HSFO discount to compliant LSFO and gasoil materialized. Refining capacity

The global refinery system will see about 1.4 million b/d of throughput capacity closed due to the IMO regulation, OPEC forecast.

Two weeks ago, refining sources told S&P Global Platts that up to 800,000 b/d of refining capacity is at risk in Western Europe alone due to IMO 2020.

But OPEC said the adoption of scrubbers could lead to some shuttered refinery capacity being restarted.

The HOVENSA refinery in the US Virgin Islands is expected to effect a partial restart by end-2019 with a focus on processing heavy crude and producing 0.5% sulfur marine fuel. The Wilhelmshaven refinery, which ceased operations 10 years ago, will also restart soon to take advantage of its feedstock units.

Source:hellenicshippingnews

The use of drones in shipping and cover implications

0

As drone technology has recently seen an increased popularity in maritime surveillance, Ben Burkard, Underwriting Director, and Julian Hines, Loss Prevention Manager at the Standard P&I Club, consider the risks, rewards, as well as the potential regulatory issues surrounding the use of drones in shipping.

What are the potential uses in shipping?

Deliveries

Companies are currently experimenting with drone delivery services for ships at anchorage, for items such as spare parts, mail, stores, documentation and medical equipment. Drones launched from onshore are capable of delivering to ships up to two miles away and it is estimated that the use of drones could reduce the cost of these services by a factor of ten.

Surveys

Currently, the biggest single use of drones in shipping is for inspection purposes and some class societies are already using drones as part of their survey programme. This allows for a much more comprehensive survey given the ease with which drones can access hard-to-reach areas as well as reduce risks. Examples include:

  • inspection of flare stack, tops of cranes and confined spaces. If repair work is necessary, the drone’s findings can be used in writing job specifications and access requirements
  • remote inspection of the hull exterior or interior of tanks and other areas where surveyors cannot get to during typical on/off-hire condition surveys or routine inspections
  • inspection during repair, conversion and newbuilding of ships or prior to handover
  • damage surveys (aerial/tank) after an incident
  • inspection prior to reactivation of ships
  • inspections of moorings and anchorages
  • inspection of tow arrangement from tow lines through to the unmanned towed object
  • aerial videography for ship launch, delivery, mobilisation, demobilisation, loading of project cargo
  • port authorities testing ships’ emissions as they enter port
  • search and rescue.

Legal and regulatory issues

It is likely that Flag states will continue to drive the legal side. In the UK, for example, if a drone is to be operated for commercial purposes, it must follow UK CAA guidelines. Under these guidelines, drone operators must first be approved and have appropriate insurance in place prior to submitting an application. The USA and countries in Europe and South-East Asia follow similar regulations. It is probable that most countries and classification societies will require drone pilots to have completed some form of BVLOS certification (Beyond Visual Line of Sight) for the flying of drones outside the line of sight.

Currently, the only industry standard is for operations in the UK offshore sector: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Operations Management Standards and Guidelines – Issue 1 2017.

Loss prevention advice

A prudent owner considering the operation of drones onboard their vessel should:

  • gain clarification of regulatory approval (Class) to use the drone
  • ensure pilots have BVLOS certification and type-approved training for the use of drones
  • where necessary, have a valid Activity Permit from the relevant civil aviation authority for every flight
  • complete a detailed risk assessment for the use of the drone
  • have appropriate operating procedures in place, including a permit to work.

Are liabilities arising from drones operated onboard ships covered by P&I? Whether the use of drones is, or should be, excluded by the pool has been considered by the International Group, and whilst it is acknowledged that it is an area that should be subject to ongoing debate, the position currently remains that liabilities arising from the operation of a drone is not included within the list of excluded losses set out in the Pooling Agreement.

However, in order to meet the requirements for pooling, the other provisions in the rules and the pooling agreement must be complied with. These will include the fact that the use of drones must be able to be considered to be part of the management and operation of the entered ship, and any contractual arrangements must meet the requirements of the general contracting principles set out in the pooling agreement. In relation to services being provided by the ship, we would require either a knock for knock allocation or that the member does not assume responsibility for liabilities that they would not otherwise have had at law. Any services to the entered ship should be considered under the principles of best endeavours.

In the case of uncertainty of whether these principles have been met or if an extension is required, please get in touch with your usual club contact.

Source:safety4sea